Legislature(1993 - 1994)

1993-04-21 Senate Journal

Full Journal pdf

1993-04-21                     Senate Journal                      Page 1615
SB 76                                                                        
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 76(FIN) was before the Senate on                        
reconsideration.                                                               
                                                                               
Senator Duncan offered Amendment No. 24  (title amendment):                     
                                                                               
	Page 1:  Delete lines 1-12                                                    
                                                                               
	Page 2:  Delete line 1 before "preventing"                                    
                                                                               
Page 2, line 1:  Insert  "An Act relating to charitable                       
gaming;"                                                                       
                                                                               
	Page 2, line 9:  Delete after  "extortion"                                    
                                                                               
	Page 2:  Delete lines 10-23                                                   
                                                                               
	Page 2, line 24:  Delete before "prohibiting"                                 
                                                                               
	Renumber as appropriate.                                                      
                                                                               
Senator Duncan moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 24.                     
Senators Pearce, Taylor objected.                                              
                                                                               
The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 24 be adopted?"  The                  
roll was taken with the following result:                                      
                                                                               
CSSB 76(FIN)                                                                   
Third Reading                                                                  
Amendment No. 24                                                               
                                                                               
YEAS:  9   NAYS:  11   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                              
                                                                               
Yeas:  Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo,          
Zharoff                                                                        
                                                                               
Nays:  Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips,          
Rieger, Sharp, Taylor                                                          
                                                                               
and so, Amendment No. 24 failed.                                               
                                                                               
Senator Donley requested a ruling from the Chair on the division of            
the question on reconsideration of CS FOR SENATE BILL NO.                      
76(FIN).                                                                       

1993-04-21                     Senate Journal                      Page 1616
SB 76                                                                        
Senator Pearce rose to a point of order, citing dilatory action.               
President Halford ruled the action was not dilatory at this time.              
                                                                               
President Halford ruled the question not divisible.  Senator Duncan            
appealed the ruling of the Chair.                                              
                                                                               
The question being: "Shall the ruling of the Chair be upheld?"  The            
roll was taken with the following result:                                      
                                                                               
Uphold ruling of the Chair?                                                    
                                                                               
YEAS:  11   NAYS:  9   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                              
                                                                               
Yeas:  Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips,          
Rieger, Sharp, Taylor                                                          
                                                                               
Nays:  Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo,          
Zharoff                                                                        
                                                                               
Zharoff changed from "Yea" to "Nay".                                           
                                                                               
and so, the ruling of the Chair was upheld.                                    
                                                                               
The question to be reconsidered: "Shall CS FOR SENATE BILL                     
NO. 76(FIN) "An Act requiring regulations relating to pull-tabs to             
be consistent with North American Gaming Regulators Association                
standards on pull-tabs to the extent permitted by charitable gaming            
laws; allowing permittees to contract with vendors to sell pull-tabs           
on behalf of the permittee at an establishment holding a package               
store license and certain establishments holding a beverage                    
dispensary license; allowing municipalities to prohibit vendors from           
conducting gaming activities within the municipality; restricting the          
purchase of pull-tabs by permittees, licensees, and vendors and their          
owners, managers, and employees; requiring receipts before prizes of           
$50 or more may be awarded in pull-tab games; prohibiting                      
distributors from supplying pull-tabs to vendors; requiring the                
registration of vendors and regulating activities involving them;              
requiring the licensing of out-of-state pull-tab manufacturers;                
requiring the department regulating charitable gaming to approve               

1993-04-21                     Senate Journal                      Page 1617
SB 76                                                                        
contracts between permittees and operators before gaming may occur;            
preventing persons with felony convictions or convictions for crimes           
involving theft or dishonesty or a violation of gambling laws from             
being involved in charitable gaming activities as a permittee,                 
licensee, vendor, person responsible for the operation of an activity,         
fund raiser or consultant of a licensee or vendor, or employee in a            
managerial or supervisory capacity, and providing exceptions for               
certain persons whose convictions are at least 10 years old and are            
not for violation of an unclassified felony described in AS 11, a              
class A felony, or extortion; relating to multiple-beneficiary                 
charitable gaming permits and door prizes for charitable gaming;               
requiring operators to pay permittees each quarter at least 30 percent         
of the adjusted gross income from a pull-tab activity and limiting             
operators to expenses of not more than 70 percent of the adjusted              
gross income from that activity; requiring operators to pay permittees         
each quarter at least 10 percent of the adjusted gross income from             
a charitable gaming activity other than pull-tabs and limiting                 
operators to expenses of not more than 90 percent of the adjusted              
gross income from that activity; requiring a permittee who uses a              
pull-tab vendor to enter into a contract with that vendor; requiring           
a vendor contracting with a permittee to pay the permittee at least            
50 percent of the ideal net for each pull-tab series delivered to the          
vendor by the permittee; requiring that operators report an adjusted           
gross income of at least 15 percent of gross income each quarter;              
allowing the commissioner regulating charitable gaming to issue                
orders prohibiting violations of state gaming laws; relating to the            
authority of the commissioner regulating charitable gaming to                  
suspend or revoke a permit, license, or registration; prohibiting the          
direct contribution of proceeds of a bingo or pull-tab game to a               
candidate for a public office of the state or a political subdivision of       
the state or to that candidate's campaign organization; prohibiting the        
payment of any portion of the net proceeds of a charitable gaming              
activity to a registered lobbyist; relating to `political uses' and            
`political organizations' as those terms are used in the charitable            
gaming statutes; and providing for an effective date" pass the                 
Senate?"  The roll was taken with the following result:                        
                                                                               

1993-04-21                     Senate Journal                      Page 1618
SB 76                                                                        
                                                                               
CSSB 76(FIN)                                                                   
Third Reading - On Reconsideration                                             
Effective Dates                                                                
                                                                               
YEAS:  15   NAYS:  5   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                              
                                                                               
Yeas:  Donley, Ellis, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Kerttula, Leman,           
Lincoln, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor                       
                                                                               
Nays:  Adams, Duncan, Little, Salo, Zharoff                                    
                                                                               
and so, CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 76(FIN) passed the Senate on                    
reconsideration.                                                               
                                                                               
Senator Taylor moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on              
the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the effective date           
clauses.  Senator Little objected, then withdrew her objection.  There         
being no further objections, it was so ordered.                                
                                                                               
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 76(FIN) was referred to the Secretary                   
for engrossment.